3 ms·
Tried it for a bit. A great start. The good: - Half the memory usage on my machine compared to other graphical editors. - It is extremely fast, though as all
by eek2121 5y ago
Tried it for a bit. A great start.
The good:
- Half the memory usage on my machine compared to other graphical editors.
- It is extremely fast, though as all the missing features get added, we'll see if it stays that way.
Some basic QoL improvements needed
- Needs syntax highlighting for more languages (Ruby/JS in my case)
- Needs to use the system dialogs on Windows and macOS. Had a difficult time using other drive mount types. The built-in dialog would not open them at first.
I will be keeping an eye on this one. The only one that beats it speed-wise and memory wise is vim. :)