3 ms·
>> They might be potentially harmful, people should be informed about how they work and possible consequences, but going beyond and restricting/regulating is no
by basisword 5y ago
>> They might be potentially harmful, people should be informed about how they work and possible consequences, but going beyond and restricting/regulating is no-no.
So a child should be able to purchase booze, cocaine, heroin provided they are informed of the risks?
- can16358p 5y agoYup. Again I'm not supporting any use of substances, but I think everyone of any age or gender should be deciding for their own when it comes to their body.
- basisword 5y agoYeah, those junkie 5 year olds really ought to take responsibility for their actions. I really hope you're trolling.
- can16358p 5y agoI'm not trolling. Though if their parents let them into situations where they can get heroin, it's the parents that need to take the blame.
- basisword 5y ago>> if their parents let them into situations where they can get heroin, it's the parents that need to take the blame That's very different to: >> I think everyone of any age or gender should be deciding for their own when it comes to their body. It also doesn't account for shitty parents.
- can16358p 5y agoWell anyone can decide for their own. But if someone, say 9, wants heroin, their parents should prevent this. Shitty parents is definitely an issue though I still think we should focus on parents instead of ${potentially addictive service/substance provider}. Yeah I might have not been clear on my first comment.