3 ms·
Personally I don't think what he did was wrong. I think the moral of the story is don't do non-work related things on your work computer. It shifts the liabil
by ratg13 5y ago
Personally I don't think what he did was wrong.
I think the moral of the story is don't do non-work related things on your work computer. It shifts the liability from the individual to the company.
- meetups323 5y agoBut also don't do work related things on your non-work computer. Investigating the source code of your company's competitor's products is absolutely work related.
- Benjammer 5y agoThe thing that is kind of baffling to me about so many people in this comment section is that they think their personal opinion about the ethics of what he did has any bearing on anything. That's not how the legal system works at all. To quote Tom Scott, a youtuber, "I'm not telling you how it should be, I'm just telling you how it is."
- aldebran 5y agoPrecisely. Any corporate lawyer reading this thread is probably hoping none of the engineers in their company think this way. In my old company we were told to perform competitor analysis only through publicly available information - blogs, marketing announcements, videos, ads, etc. No creating a free account to poke around. I often wondered what happened in the past to have this rule.
- ratg13 5y agoAll the actions here were decisions made by a private company. At the present time the legal system is not involved beyond anything other than the terms of employment in the employee's contract. Just because a company may have the right to fire a person at will does not prove that the employee did anything wrong. (morally or legally)