4 ms·

At least they went with "lighting-fast" instead of "blazing-fast"

• chrismorgan 5y ago
  “Lightning fast” is no less meaningless in practice than “blazing fast”. Both get used extensively by projects in such languages as JavaScript and Rust, on projects of similar scope that nonetheless have at least an order or two of magnitude’s performance difference.
  • randomsearch 5y ago
    Vite is a tool that deserves this moniker
    • ncmncm 5y ago
      What would one use Vite in place of?
      • randomsearch 5y ago
        webpack
  • ncmncm 5y ago
    If the title claims "lightning fast" or "blazing fast", I expect to see quantitative comparisons to alternatives. Which operations are faster than in other programs? alacritty is a Rust program that is promoted as uniquely fast, but is substantially slower than (e.g.) kitty.
• infinitezest 5y ago
  I myself only use software that is "made with <3"
  • seanw444 5y ago
    I cringe quite hard when I see projects with either of these now-cliche catchphrases. It's crazy how many people use them.
  • follower 5y ago
    I, too, only use software that is "made with binary".
• ASalazarMX 5y ago
  I still prefer it to the "performant and beautiful" Electron made famous. almost all of the applications that said that were neither performant or beautiful, unless you found web pages and their quirks more beautiful than native GUIs.