3 ms·

This is the part I’m stunned about. So many in this thread don’t see the liability of unpacking a competitors app and poking around their APIs. Forget CC fraud

This is the part I’m stunned about. So many in this thread don’t see the liability of unpacking a competitors app and poking around their APIs. Forget CC fraud. This opens up liability for IP theft. Even if the other company doesn’t win the case it is going to create a shitstorm that might potentially give them free PR. “Look our new product is so good their devs are reverse engineering our innovation to copy us” Forget what this person found out. Going and unpacking the app and using private APIs itself was a dumb move regardless of what happened after. People can be idealistic and talk about intent but it really is a bad move that opens all kinds of liabilities.

ratg13 5y ago
Personally I don't think what he did was wrong. I think the moral of the story is don't do non-work related things on your work computer. It shifts the liability from the individual to the company.
- meetups323 5y ago
  But also don't do work related things on your non-work computer. Investigating the source code of your company's competitor's products is absolutely work related.
- Benjammer 5y ago
  The thing that is kind of baffling to me about so many people in this comment section is that they think their personal opinion about the ethics of what he did has any bearing on anything. That's not how the legal system works at all. To quote Tom Scott, a youtuber, "I'm not telling you how it should be, I'm just telling you how it is."
  - aldebran 5y ago
    Precisely. Any corporate lawyer reading this thread is probably hoping none of the engineers in their company think this way. In my old company we were told to perform competitor analysis only through publicly available information - blogs, marketing announcements, videos, ads, etc. No creating a free account to poke around. I often wondered what happened in the past to have this rule.
  - ratg13 5y ago
    All the actions here were decisions made by a private company. At the present time the legal system is not involved beyond anything other than the terms of employment in the employee's contract. Just because a company may have the right to fire a person at will does not prove that the employee did anything wrong. (morally or legally)

ratg13 5y ago

Personally I don't think what he did was wrong. I think the moral of the story is don't do non-work related things on your work computer. It shifts the liability from the individual to the company.

meetups323 5y ago
But also don't do work related things on your non-work computer. Investigating the source code of your company's competitor's products is absolutely work related.
Benjammer 5y ago
The thing that is kind of baffling to me about so many people in this comment section is that they think their personal opinion about the ethics of what he did has any bearing on anything. That's not how the legal system works at all. To quote Tom Scott, a youtuber, "I'm not telling you how it should be, I'm just telling you how it is."
- aldebran 5y ago
  Precisely. Any corporate lawyer reading this thread is probably hoping none of the engineers in their company think this way. In my old company we were told to perform competitor analysis only through publicly available information - blogs, marketing announcements, videos, ads, etc. No creating a free account to poke around. I often wondered what happened in the past to have this rule.
- ratg13 5y ago
  All the actions here were decisions made by a private company. At the present time the legal system is not involved beyond anything other than the terms of employment in the employee's contract. Just because a company may have the right to fire a person at will does not prove that the employee did anything wrong. (morally or legally)