I'm not a lawyer but in addition to the other crimes this would be a trademark violation. If they're arguing the malware version is Fedora, it would constitute

I'm not a lawyer but in addition to the other crimes this would be a trademark violation. If they're arguing the malware version is Fedora, it would constitute an attempt to "misleadingly to divert Internet users or to tarnish Complainant's FEDORA trademark." Since Fedora is trademarked it doesn't matter if it's marketed as Red Hat Fedora or some other Fedora.