4 ms·
> Using anonymisation proxies just makes it all the more suspicious If you're referring to the author's use of Charles Proxy, it's *not* an anonymizer or anyth
by DaiPlusPlus 5y ago
> Using anonymisation proxies just makes it all the more suspicious
If you're referring to the author's use of Charles Proxy, it's *not* an anonymizer or anything of the sort, it's just the macOS equivalent of Fiddler: a localhost HTTP/HTTPS proxy that lets you decrypt TLS traffic (provided the client software isn't using certificate-pinning, which it wasn't).
From TFA:
> Wondering how I could feed them to the app, I set up Charles Proxy and pointed my phone to it. I honestly thought this wouldn’t work – who at this time doesn’t have SSL Pinning?
https://www.charlesproxy.com/ https://www.charlesproxy.com/
https://www.telerik.com/fiddler https://www.telerik.com/fiddler
As a curious user of other applications I've done the same thing the the author has described, so this kinda stuff isn't uncommon - except in my case I've never had an opportunity to stumble across anything as bad the author.
As for phone-app' insecure back-end web-services: that's about par for the course thesedays, even for banking and other "secure" services. It's depressing. I have plenty of my own pet-theories as to why things seem worse today than they were 10 years ago, but that's another discussion.
- Aachen 5y ago> If you're referring to the author's use of Charles Proxy, it's *not* an anonymizer I am not, I was referring to the suggestions broadly shared elsewhere in the thread of doing this anonymously instead.