If this description gets submitted as evidence, the case will be dismissed. The way it is described is 100% legit pen testing with public data and endpoints and

If this description gets submitted as evidence, the case will be dismissed. The way it is described is 100% legit pen testing with public data and endpoints and no malicious use of vulnerabilities found. If this is actually what happened the case will get thrown out. Is it ethically wrong to check a public product to see if it follows basic security protocols? Especially if you’re an expert having created those security controls previously? Obviously not. Is it ethically wrong to ask your employer before submitting findings to a competitor? Maybe? But only because you have an obligation to disclose regardless of what your employer says, but a judge isn’t going to be mad about following chain of command. It probably helped the bug report get p0 attention from the security team. The fact of the matter is if the vulnerabilities were real and it sounds like they were, it’s fantastic news that the vulnerable company was able to fix them before the errors were exploited widely.