3 ms·
Ah, the `intmax_t` problem is a fun one. Perhaps it should never have been introduced.
by cryptonector 5y ago
Ah, the `intmax_t` problem is a fun one. Perhaps it should never have been introduced.
- gpderetta 5y agoYes, for the most part intmax_t (and similar guarantees) is considered a mistake. In C++, the next mistake is going to be the hardware_{constructive,destructive}_interference_size constants that have serious ABI implications. I think that current GCC position is that they are not part of the ABI and they are subject to change (but also controllable from the command line).