> that would truly be "good enough". I think 99% of the population could agree on a "good enough" font, if reading comprehension is the goal. In fact, I think

> that would truly be "good enough". I think 99% of the population could agree on a "good enough" font, if reading comprehension is the goal. In fact, I think 99% of the population just reads the words. Our brains necessarily learn to ignore the fonts. Our brains necessarily learn to ignore even the characters themselves [1]. > There are a bajillion fonts that are perfectly legible and for those of us who care, they make a difference. I think this demonstrates that the goal is not reading comprehension, which makes agreeing on some "good enough" difficult/impossible. 1: https://www.livescience.com/18392-reading-jumbled-words.html https://www.livescience.com/18392-reading-jumbled-words.html