I think part of the problem here is that there are multiple incidents being conflated. For instance, people are saying that the pilots visually confirmed the in

I think part of the problem here is that there are multiple incidents being conflated. For instance, people are saying that the pilots visually confirmed the incident with their own eyes, but (according to the article) that would not have been possible given the distance between the plane and the object. Is there a source to indicate that in the specific incident being covered by this article, that there is any evidence beyond the video itself?