This sounds a little similar to the hubris of the GNU moe [1] manual. You're assuming you could make a "good enough" font that would truly be "good enough". I d

This sounds a little similar to the hubris of the GNU moe [1] manual. You're assuming you could make a "good enough" font that would truly be "good enough". I don't think you can even come close. A font adds so much character to the text. Where one font may be appropriate, a different text would look stilted or silly. Fiction, fantasy, technical, non-technical non-fiction, etc. books all require different fonts, in my opinion, to capture the character of the words. Noto is a fine font, but I don't want to use it for my blog. There are a bajillion fonts that are perfectly legible and for those of us who care, they make a difference. What would help would be a little education and maybe some UX nudges: stop making Arial the default on stuff, (looking at you, Google Docs) encourage well-built fonts by making them the only default enabled options in your OS, etc. I don't think there is "one font to rule them all", however. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29990149 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29990149