Both Kata Containers and UTM support virtio-fs, so this is not strictly true. The former can be used as a stand-in replacement for the runtime used by docker de

Both Kata Containers and UTM support virtio-fs, so this is not strictly true. The former can be used as a stand-in replacement for the runtime used by docker desktop[1]. With the latter, one could use a UTM-backed guest as a docker runtime in macOS[2] or run docker directly on the guest[3]. [1] https://github.com/kata-containers/documentation/blob/master/how-to/how-to-use-virtio-fs-with-kata.md https://github.com/kata-containers/documentation/blob/master... [2] https://www.codeluge.com/post/setting-up-docker-on-macos-m1-arm64-to-use-debian-10.4-docker-engine/ https://www.codeluge.com/post/setting-up-docker-on-macos-m1-... [3] https://www.lifeintech.com/2021/11/03/docker-performance-on-m1/ https://www.lifeintech.com/2021/11/03/docker-performance-on-...