4 ms·
The article seems to be focused on the potential risk of interfering with medical devices using the same frequencies for communication. The more obvious danger
by somebodynew 5y ago
The article seems to be focused on the potential risk of interfering with medical devices using the same frequencies for communication. The more obvious danger of a microwave oven is that you must not stick your hand inside a microwave with a defective door sensor while it is running as it will cause heating in the same way that it can boil a cup of water.
I will note, however, that the statement "microwaves are non-ionizing" does not automatically imply the common follow-up that "the absorption of microwaves cannot have any chemical effect other than indirectly through heating". This is evident, for example, in that proteins in the human eye undergo a chemical change in response to absorbing non-ionizing red light. Whether there is such a thing as a non-thermally microwave-driven chemical reaction is an open question in chemistry [1].
I feel the need to clarify as an addendum that nothing in this post suggests any danger associated with the use of low power microwave radiation from consumer wireless communication electronics.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-thermal_microwave_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-thermal_microwave_effect