3 ms·
My take of this is that those commercial entities are not raising hell over this. Commercial entities have the buying power (not the individuals nor the single
by Isthatablackgsd 5y ago
My take of this is that those commercial entities are not raising hell over this. Commercial entities have the buying power (not the individuals nor the single developer(s) of the company) and they are complicit with it. The reason why Docker haven't change stance on the pricing because those entities haven't/don't attempt to use their buying power to sway Docker to change their stance. Yes, developers are raised hell over it but their power as a developers in the commercial entities are not equal. Developers does not run the company, the board of director/CEO/founder/owner does as they please. They just accepts it. That is not the fault of Docker, that is on those commercial entities who have the money continue to pay for those. It is too late to change the stance on this because entities have been paying for Docker support for YEARS and YEARS and YEARS, even way before that last year pricing tier changes.