12 ms·
To me, "US Copyright Office won't accept AI-generated work" implies that work generated by AI won't be accepted. However, it turns out that work generated by A
by CamelCaseName 5y ago
To me, "US Copyright Office won't accept AI-generated work" implies that work generated by AI won't be accepted.
However, it turns out that work generated by AI will be accepted, albeit under a human name.
- kube-system 5y agoBut, that is what they say: > [T]he Office will not register works produced by a machine or mere mechanical process that operates randomly or automatically without any creative input or intervention from a human author. This is a clash between the marketing BS that is contemporary "AI" and reality. "AI" is either sentient, or it's a human tool. The copyright office is requiring that people cut the BS and concede that just because you have particularly complicated tool, doesn't mean it's not just a tool. It's like someone attempting to register a book copyright to a typewriter, the Copyright Office rolling their eyes, and responding: "Well, smart ass, if the typewriter wrote it, then it's ineligible."