> Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? This is clearly explained, multiple times, in the article that you yourself linked to:

> Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? This is clearly explained, multiple times, in the article that you yourself linked to: > This time, the CNIL decision, dated 17 March 2011, concerns data collected for the implementation of the “Google Latitude” service, which enables geolocation of users that have a Google account and a “smartphone”. > The users’ phones themselves since they are used for the purposes of geolocation. If you are claiming that no phone data was collected, then how do you explain this quotation which I have now quoted three times: >>> The CNIL held that since it was carried out without the knowledge of the data subjects, the collection of data using the “Google Cars” or the mobile phones of “Google Latitude” users was carried out unfairly and therefore in breach of article 6.1° of the French data protection law.