2 ms·

I am not sure why you continue to misrepresent this case. Using Google Car data was only one of the privacy violations, the other was mobile phone data. I will

I am not sure why you continue to misrepresent this case. Using Google Car data was only one of the privacy violations, the other was mobile phone data. I will post the quotation one more time: > The CNIL held that since it was carried out without the knowledge of the data subjects, the collection of data using the “Google Cars” or the mobile phones of “Google Latitude” users was carried out unfairly and therefore in breach of article 6.1° of the French data protection law. Notice the whole "or the mobile phones" section, which comes after the Google Cars section which you are pretending is the only pertinent section?

lern_too_spel 5y ago
And I am not sure why you keep pretending there was any nonconsensual data collection from the phone, quoting the article author's poor wording instead of the actual claims brought against Google. The article specifically describes which data was nonconsensually obtained by the cars. Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? Look at the numbered claims. Edit: I can't respond because you've made this thread too long. Once again, reread the numbered claims that CNIL brought against Google. None of your quotes are supported by the claims. (Technically, you're misinterpreting the first quote in your comment below, which is about data collected for Latitude, not data collected by Latitude. To avoid making mistakes of interpreting the author's interpretation, simply read the numbered claims.)
- Ansil849 5y ago
  > Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? This is clearly explained, multiple times, in the article that you yourself linked to: > This time, the CNIL decision, dated 17 March 2011, concerns data collected for the implementation of the “Google Latitude” service, which enables geolocation of users that have a Google account and a “smartphone”. > The users’ phones themselves since they are used for the purposes of geolocation. If you are claiming that no phone data was collected, then how do you explain this quotation which I have now quoted three times: >>> The CNIL held that since it was carried out without the knowledge of the data subjects, the collection of data using the “Google Cars” or the mobile phones of “Google Latitude” users was carried out unfairly and therefore in breach of article 6.1° of the French data protection law.

lern_too_spel 5y ago

And I am not sure why you keep pretending there was any nonconsensual data collection from the phone, quoting the article author's poor wording instead of the actual claims brought against Google. The article specifically describes which data was nonconsensually obtained by the cars. Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? Look at the numbered claims. Edit: I can't respond because you've made this thread too long. Once again, reread the numbered claims that CNIL brought against Google. None of your quotes are supported by the claims. (Technically, you're misinterpreting the first quote in your comment below, which is about data collected for Latitude, not data collected by Latitude. To avoid making mistakes of interpreting the author's interpretation, simply read the numbered claims.)

Ansil849 5y ago
> Can you tell me which data was nonconsensually obtained from phones? This is clearly explained, multiple times, in the article that you yourself linked to: > This time, the CNIL decision, dated 17 March 2011, concerns data collected for the implementation of the “Google Latitude” service, which enables geolocation of users that have a Google account and a “smartphone”. > The users’ phones themselves since they are used for the purposes of geolocation. If you are claiming that no phone data was collected, then how do you explain this quotation which I have now quoted three times: >>> The CNIL held that since it was carried out without the knowledge of the data subjects, the collection of data using the “Google Cars” or the mobile phones of “Google Latitude” users was carried out unfairly and therefore in breach of article 6.1° of the French data protection law.