3 ms·
It’s more frustration than elitism. Take the topic of Machine Learning for example, there’s really few people on planet earth that can discuss the implications
by crate_barre 5y ago
It’s more frustration than elitism. Take the topic of Machine Learning for example, there’s really few people on planet earth that can discuss the implications of it in detail. To broaden membership into that discussion, you have to provide a lifeline in the context of ‘what are the implications of AI with respect to future work, will humanity ever have to work again?’ - ok, now most people can take part.
The frustration is, why is gossip and conspiracy lifelines necessary for topics that most people should have no issue discussing? You really can’t add anything without that stuff?
Anyways, I heard Hunter Biden is a drug addict, and Putin has cancer, and that’s why he’s invading Ukraine.
- matthewmacleod 5y agoThere are absolutely vast numbers of people who can comfortably discuss the implications of machine learning – people from all walks of life with many different perspectives, including technologists, artists, economists, politicians and more. This seems like a straw man. Having a topic under discussion is hardly "gossip" or a "conspiracy lifeline".