4 ms·
>The problem is that something barely usable is better than something nonexistent No necessarily. I think sometimes the existence of something, even if only b
by billswift 15y ago
>The problem is that something barely usable is better than something nonexistent
No necessarily. I think sometimes the existence of something, even if only barely usable, blocks the creation of something else that might be better.
- alnayyir 15y agoOTOH, perfect can at times be the enemy of good. You have to weigh the value of immediacy against permanently enshrined qualities and perform your own cost-benefit analysis. This is called critical thinking, they introduce this around age 12 in most western societies. You don't have to pick a religion and stick with it, you can just make a judgment call on a case-by-case basis. Works great for me, fyi.