3 ms·
[edit: misunderstanding]
by ushakov 5y ago
[edit: misunderstanding]
- nkallen 5y agoPlease correct me if I’m wrong but I was not under that impression https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5419923/can-gpl-be-re-licensed https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5419923/can-gpl-be-re-li... I thought I am the copyright owner and I can offer my code under as many licenses as I want. Many people dual license gpl code is my understanding. Converting my own code to mit should be allowed right? Every Google result I’ve found says I’m the copyright owner and I can offer as many licenses as I want. Are you just trolling?
- mintplant 5y agoCorrect, the commenter you're replying to appears to be completely misinformed.
- ginko 5y ago>GPL means the code belongs to the public and you cannot copyright it That's incorrect. The author still retains the copyright and is free to relicense their work any way they want.