3 ms·
a) that would be an act of war facilitated by a private company, so, yeah, not a great idea, and b) do people really want to set a precedent of having a privat
by nunez 5y ago
a) that would be an act of war facilitated by a private company, so, yeah, not a great idea, and
b) do people really want to set a precedent of having a private company prevent access to the thing you bought because you disagree with a political position?
- unityByFreedom 5y ago(b) is reasonable, (a) is not how I would classify such a move.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- rlpb 5y agoI think it's relevant to note that the Russian government is being complicit in the theft of many billions of dollars worth of aircraft that leasing companies are entitled to have back under the terms of their existing agreements. In doing so, Russia is also wiping out their value. During war, not supporting the effort is normally what is considered unacceptable. Private individuals and companies are all expected to do their part.
- rat9988 5y agoIndeed they are, but my understanding is the us is not at war. Ukranian companies have to though.