7 ms·
That Washingtonian story was a big nothing. In December 1973, supposedly 80% of Americans favored DST through the winter, but this fell by fully half to 40% on
by randcraw 5y ago
That Washingtonian story was a big nothing.
In December 1973, supposedly 80% of Americans favored DST through the winter, but this fell by fully half to 40% only three months later — during the DARKEST three months of the year? How does that make any sense? Americans then would rather that darkness begin at 5, BEFORE they can drive home?
Nonsense. Any statistic that counterintuitive bears much fuller explanation. It reeks of manipulation, such as a PR campaign by some social influencer of the day claiming to “protect our helpless little children brought to death's door by a wicked law obviously invented by Communists”.
However, if a greater context behind the story HAD been provided, it's likely there woyld be no story — just as there WAS no threat to schoolchildren. (Nor would there be any today, since nobody walks to school anymore.)
Now THIS is news I can’t use.
- interestica 5y ago"The US Tried Permanent Daylight Saving Time in the ’70s. People Hated It" There would be no difference here if the article said: "The US Tried Permanent Daylight Saving Time in the ’70s. People Loved It" Both imply (some) people. Both would (technically) be correct. A story could be squeezed out of either. Bad writing.