3 ms·
I agree completely with both parts of the second half of your post, and I think the parent commenter above yours does as well. The first half, however, is neit
by danielvf 5y ago
I agree completely with both parts of the second half of your post, and I think the parent commenter above yours does as well.
The first half, however, is neither kind, nor thoughtful. It's a direct attack on someone, rather than engaging in mutual learning on the subject at hand.
- dylan604 5y agoI agree, except it was meant to be a tounge-in-cheek response rather than a blatant FU. I was hoping the specific phrasing would be identifiable as such. Clearly I fell victim to the assuming part. However, phrases like left cost lib are pretty much equally an attack on someone as well. Not saying tit-for-tat is the level of discourse, but I was hoping to make it laughable with the retort rather than escalate. Mission NOT accomplished. Got it.