4 ms·
I disagree, polluting vehicles are basically an enemy occupying force in our cities. Unless it’s a work vehicle, emergency services, there’s no reason to drive
by fennecs 5y ago
I disagree, polluting vehicles are basically an enemy occupying force in our cities. Unless it’s a work vehicle, emergency services, there’s no reason to drive such a thing around a city. It’s not like the owners have no choice too, they could afford a smaller more practical car. Every bit of resistance helps. Hacking peoples behaviour is what we need.
- RhysU 5y agoThis line of reasoning has no limiting principle. Anything beyond anyone's personal stance on climate would become fair game for vigilante harassment.
- klhutchins 5y agoPeople from rural areas never have to go to the city...
- fennecs 5y agoWith 99% certainty, every luxury SUV with fancy tyres and wheels in my suburb is definitely not a farm vehicle, nor has it ever been used off road.
- rascul 5y ago> People from rural areas never have to go to the city... I try not to but sometimes it happens. I don't drive enough outside of work to justify even the insurance on my car. So it stays parked and on the rare occasion I have to make a trip that's not for work, or on the way home from work, I must drive my truck. Sometimes I even need the truck outside of work.
- dag11 5y ago> Unless it’s a work vehicle, emergency services, there’s no reason to drive such a thing around a city. I live in a city and purchased an electric car for scuba diving, something I do regularly and wouldn't be able to do without it. According to the website, they'd have no problem deflating my tires. How can that be justified?