> It should be criminal when the product has safety inplocation I think you meant "implication". And no there is no "safety implications" in this case. This is

> It should be criminal when the product has safety inplocation I think you meant "implication". And no there is no "safety implications" in this case. This is just someone violating their NDA while also badmouthing their employer and being fired for it. > Yes, personal retaliation against criticism is about as 'proper' behaviour as is pissing in public There is zero evidence of any "personal retaliation" here.