5 ms·
Assuming they have decent source control and an audit trail (most safety critical things do) you would probably have an easier time hiring someone to throw them
by Guvante 5y ago
Assuming they have decent source control and an audit trail (most safety critical things do) you would probably have an easier time hiring someone to throw them off the cliff.
Assuming you care if people find out you did it of course but if literal murder via software hacking doesn't get you in trouble then you could just hire a hitman for less money.
- ClumsyPilot 5y agoSo you are relying on Tesla to monitor Tesla and gather evidence of criminal behaviour by Tesla. Seriously, does noone see a tiny flaw here?
- Guvante 5y agoThis isn't something that is easy to do. You need to interact with probably 12 people any of whom could trivially copy the data off the machine and whistleblow you. Criminal behavior implies something minor. Murdering a dissident isn't minor.
- randcraw 5y agoOf course, those 12 people could also expect to receive the same kind of 'sanction' that they just witnessed. And since their employer has access to all their personal communications while in the car, the company has access to a wealth of the most sensitive personal info that's almost trivial to abuse, if in fact retaliatory murder WAS considered to be overkill. That might be enough to dissuade them from whistleblowing. (That and the fact that whistleblowing is nearly always a great way to commit professional suicide in this country.)