This service is apparently "$12,000 up front or $199 per month" according to this article. You are saying that people should not be allowed to show that this ve

This service is apparently "$12,000 up front or $199 per month" according to this article. You are saying that people should not be allowed to show that this very expensive service is not very good as it can't handle and empty street with a small pole in it? And that showing that this very expensive service is not very good is "against the terms" and should lead to "revocation" (presumably without refund)? That sounds like some border-line dystopian stuff here. Anyway, this FSD beta is billed to "enable Tesla vehicles to virtually drive themselves both on highways and city streets by simply entering a location in the navigation system, but it is still considered a level 2 driver assist since it requires driver supervision at all times." Maybe, for the safety of everyone on the road, this entire thing shouldn't exist considering how badly it performs. But apparently showing this thing is kinda crap is the problem, rather than the company using the actual roads for the beta tests of their crappy software.