4 ms·

> I find it mildly curious how much you're struggling here Where was the struggle? I point by point debunked your claims. > to make your point against somethi

by qiskit 5y ago

> I find it mildly curious how much you're struggling here Where was the struggle? I point by point debunked your claims. > to make your point against something that is exceptionally well documented. So well documented that you can't even provide one example? > Your points on "politics" in wikipedia and associated whataboutisms aren't relevant, Oh there it is. "Whataboutism" and it's obvious what is going on here. As someone who once believed it and am more than willing to believe it again, show me the evidence. I asked simple questions in this thread, you nor anyone else has been able to answer it. I'm not struggling with anything because I'm stating the truth. As I said, I once believed it and am more than willing to believe it. I just don't like being lied to. And of course the only comment in this entire thread of any substance gets flagged.

tomrod 5y ago
> you nor anyone else has been able to answer it. No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Please read the links provided. To those reading along the thread: qiskit is engaging in a very common apologetics approach intended to sow doubt on obvious things. This has been used by Russia as of late in their media, and has a long and storied history among high-demand religions attempting to create a false worldview. It proceeds by asking insincere "simple questions", ignoring responses, demanding more evidence than what was provided, then claiming failure of response because no one has supported their worldview. It often proceeds to stories of conversion from a different worldview and claims of persecution for their worldview. It's effective when people don't have time to evaluate the merits of the claims.
- qiskit 5y ago
  > No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Who is we? Are you working with someone? Are you part of some goup? > Please read the links provided. I have. Even before you provided it. What about "Once I believed in the ughyur genocide propaganda" did't you understand? And no. You haven't addressed anything. I asked you specific questions and instead of answering them, you are telling me to go find the answers. The only reason you'd do that is because I'm right and you can't answer my questions. > To those reading along the thread: qiskit is engaging in a very common apologetics approach intended to sow doubt on obvious things. Nice try. Do you realize you come off as someone reading a script rather than someone truly interested in facts or reason. > It proceeds by asking insincere "simple questions", ignoring responses Simple questions like "How does a population increase during a genocide" isn't insincere just because it makes a mockery of your false assertion. > This has been used by Russia as of late in their media Don't you mean the "CCP"? When I wrote: "Oh there it is. "Whataboutism" and it's obvious what is going on here." I called it.

by qiskit 5y ago

tomrod 5y ago

> you nor anyone else has been able to answer it. No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Please read the links provided. To those reading along the thread: qiskit is engaging in a very common apologetics approach intended to sow doubt on obvious things. This has been used by Russia as of late in their media, and has a long and storied history among high-demand religions attempting to create a false worldview. It proceeds by asking insincere "simple questions", ignoring responses, demanding more evidence than what was provided, then claiming failure of response because no one has supported their worldview. It often proceeds to stories of conversion from a different worldview and claims of persecution for their worldview. It's effective when people don't have time to evaluate the merits of the claims.

qiskit 5y ago
> No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Who is we? Are you working with someone? Are you part of some goup? > Please read the links provided. I have. Even before you provided it. What about "Once I believed in the ughyur genocide propaganda" did't you understand? And no. You haven't addressed anything. I asked you specific questions and instead of answering them, you are telling me to go find the answers. The only reason you'd do that is because I'm right and you can't answer my questions. > To those reading along the thread: qiskit is engaging in a very common apologetics approach intended to sow doubt on obvious things. Nice try. Do you realize you come off as someone reading a script rather than someone truly interested in facts or reason. > It proceeds by asking insincere "simple questions", ignoring responses Simple questions like "How does a population increase during a genocide" isn't insincere just because it makes a mockery of your false assertion. > This has been used by Russia as of late in their media Don't you mean the "CCP"? When I wrote: "Oh there it is. "Whataboutism" and it's obvious what is going on here." I called it.