3 ms·
> I predict a lot of people will want to move school start to a later hour then. I'm a proponent of this regardless. Forcing teenagers to be awake at 6AM is n
by aqme28 5y ago
> I predict a lot of people will want to move school start to a later hour then.
I'm a proponent of this regardless. Forcing teenagers to be awake at 6AM is not helpful.
- mulmen 5y agoBut 6am is a made up construct. It's an artifact of the logistics of getting kids to school before the parents' working hours and accommodating those kids' after-school jobs. If you move school an hour later then typical working hours also have to move an hour later and nothing actually changes. Our children will say it is unnatural for teenagers to wake up at 7am.
- _ph_ 5y agoThats is the reason, permanent DST won't "work". Childrens wake time is highly dependant on the sun. So, if it already makes sense to start school later, then it only gets more so, if there is permanent DST. Which means, most work times have to start later as well.
- beezle 5y agoBut but... giving little Johnny and Sally time to play after school is one of the reasons given for making DST the be all end all of time.
- stjohnswarts 5y agoThis would be better for kids, actually. An hour less of school even would be better. Kids are given too much garbage in school rather than concentrating on core education.