3 ms·
I fully agree with your approach. The important thing is that the user now has the choice to use a pointer or not: they can always use a pointer to the optional
by stingraycharles 5y ago
I fully agree with your approach. The important thing is that the user now has the choice to use a pointer or not: they can always use a pointer to the optional if they want to use pointers.
Pointers to pointers are generally something you try to avoid if possible.
- morelisp 5y ago> the user now has the choice to use a pointer or not But any benefits of the packing are gone whether I make a pointer or not. And either way, no nested pointers are involved. We’re not taking pointers to options in either case.