5 ms·
I do however find it supremely ironic that a group who is supposedly protesting about corruption and lies would produce such a blatant piece of propaganda. Espe
by JeremyBanks 15y ago
I do however find it supremely ironic that a group who is supposedly protesting about corruption and lies would produce such a blatant piece of propaganda. Especially one so readily falsifiable.
The first comment is pointing out that he doesn't actually know if it's from the organizers. The author concedes that, but it doesn't seem to have stopped him from associating it with them.
Do we now hold groups responsible for images that 50 of their supporters have shared on Facebook?
- rick888 15y agowell, the organizers didn't come out and say it was false, now did they.
- rick888 15y agoIt's a valid thought. it's popular enough so you know they've seen it, yet they haven't denied it or stopped spreading the propaganda.
- benwerd 15y agoDo we now hold groups responsible for images that 50 of their supporters have shared on Facebook? This. It's natural that sympathizers will have latched onto the image - but that just means they've been duped with everyone else.
- rick888 15y agowell, the organizers didn't come out and say it was false, now did they. (for some reason my other post is -1)
- cema 15y ago-1 means it still can be seen and read (and upvoted, if people feel so). A double posting is, at best, an error.
- InclinedPlane 15y ago"Do we now hold groups responsible for images that 50 of their supporters have shared on Facebook?" According to the treatment the Tea Party has received in the media and in public opinion: yes, yes we do.