3 ms·
Yeah, but the thing is Arrington sold, agreed to spend 2 years with AOL, then did something that is obviously a conflict of interest to get out of his obligatio
by mcantelon 15y ago
Yeah, but the thing is Arrington sold, agreed to spend 2 years with AOL, then did something that is obviously a conflict of interest to get out of his obligation. As a startup would I want to make an agreement with someone like that?
- edtechre 15y agoGood point. If Arrington and co are that blatantly corrupt out in the open, who'd want anything to do with them when the doors are closed?
- wavephorm 15y agoMaybe AOL didn't make them sign any agreements, but the way they've bailed on Techcrunch, caused a shitstorm, and started up this fund and competing tech blog all feels really slimey. I can't imagine why any startup would want to accept money or work with them.