3 ms·
It's veto-proof anyway. A lot of states have already passed similar laws and are merely waiting on the Federal law to come into effect. So it's likely to beco
by mywittyname 5y ago
It's veto-proof anyway.
A lot of states have already passed similar laws and are merely waiting on the Federal law to come into effect. So it's likely to become law soon.
- llbeansandrice 5y agoiirc states can only choose to either participate in the biannual time-change or to be on standard time year-round.
- verve_rat 5y agoHow does that work? I'm not an American, but I've heard the stories about some state that has three timezone because of an Indian reservation and some other stuff. I was under the impression that daylight savings was a state matter. Don't some states currently not observe DST while their neighbours do? What is the federal government's role in this? Can a state ignore this (almost) law and do DST anyway?
- henryfjordan 5y agoThere is some good context here: https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7,_Legislative_Power_to_Change_Daylight_Saving_Time_Measure_(2018) https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_7,_Legislativ...
- verve_rat 5y agoAwesome, thanks for that.