4 ms·
The person was already being charged $200 a year. The problem is that they are now being charged $3500 a year. You don't really adapt to that kind of price incr
by tarentel 5y ago
The person was already being charged $200 a year. The problem is that they are now being charged $3500 a year. You don't really adapt to that kind of price increase, you go somewhere else if you can find it.
- hannasanarion 5y agoThe person also uploaded over 450 hours of video. That works out to $7 per hour of video per year, which does not strike me as unreasonable. Their patreon has only one subscription option: $5/mo, at which 4400 people are subscribed, so they're bringing in $20,000/mo after Patreon's cut. Vimeo is asking for $300/mo pay for services accessible to the people who are paying in total $20,000/mo so, I really don't see what standing they have to complain here.
- tarentel 5y agoI don't think it really matters how much money the person is making. Being blind sided by 1750% increase in price would make anyone complain. Sure, they should have read the fine print and all that but to raise prices that much and say you have 9 days to comply or you don't exist to us seems like a scummy business practice. You may disagree.