> The article directly addressed this point by saying.. It addressed this point for the US. It is a US centered article. Check all of the references. The data

> The article directly addressed this point by saying.. It addressed this point for the US. It is a US centered article. Check all of the references. The data is US centric. > While counter-intuitive, tourism does not see an increase as the result of a sporting event, as often a similar amount would be spent by that city’s residents in a different city, thus creating no real net gain. True of the US maybe but not London or Paris. Also, london does not fund a private team's stadium (like PSD or Tottenham), they do sometimes fund national stadiums (like Wembley). Let’s stay on topic this article is about the US.