2 ms·
> Don't you mean 13.0, 12.2 and 11.4? Directly from freebsd.org front page, "Production: 13.0, 12.3, 12.2" But to your point, it seems like FreeBSD could elim
by tiffanyh 5y ago
> Don't you mean 13.0, 12.2 and 11.4?
Directly from freebsd.org front page, "Production: 13.0, 12.3, 12.2"
But to your point, it seems like FreeBSD could eliminate a branch since what equates to the "LTS" gets confusing due to the version methodology [0] in use.
Instead of the current flow of:
CURRENT > STABLE > BETA* > RC* > RELEASE
Maybe a more approach version methodology would be:
STABLE (stable major release) > CURRENT (testing minor release) > RELEASE (stable minor release)
^ |
|------------------------------------------
[0] https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup