4 ms·
It's also incredible how this discussion is entirely uninformed by the posted article. The reading presents several thoughtful explanations for the armor, along
by NelsonMinar 5y ago
It's also incredible how this discussion is entirely uninformed by the posted article. The reading presents several thoughtful explanations for the armor, along with reasons they don't quite make sense. Many comments here are from folks who clearly didn't read that but have Very Valuable Opinions to share. As if being a software engineer also makes you an expert in military armor.
- tyingq 5y ago>entirely uninformed by the posted article It is paywalled.
- NelsonMinar 5y agoYes, but the Economist paywall is quite generous. Also the top link here is an archive link to circumvent the paywall. Also extensions like Bypass Paywalls Clean work if for some reason you don't want to pay for the journalism you read. The alternative we have here is a completely uninformed, speculative discussion.
- tyingq 5y ago>The alternative we have here is a completely uninformed, speculative discussion. If you're talking about my other comments, they were paraphrasing similar articles I've read, rather than pure speculation. Keeping in mind that that any article is going to have speculation, as the Russians haven't said why they are doing it. That "generous paywall" is showing me ~120 words.
- katcher 5y agoAnd the archive link someone posted has invalid certs.
- choko 5y agoOr perhaps we can just not post pay-walled BS? Someone was generous to post a mirror, and I was reminded WHY I don't pay for "journalistic" content.