3 ms·
(2005) I don't know about squash, but this: > The squash player who runs back and forth to attempt every shot... doesn't appear to be true of tennis. Rafael
by bambax 5y ago
(2005)
I don't know about squash, but this:
> The squash player who runs back and forth to attempt every shot...
doesn't appear to be true of tennis. Rafael Nadal in particular is famous for trying to catch each ball and save each and every shot. Lesser players give up more easily.
- phnofive 5y agoOTOH, lesser players can't make the diving saves anyway and would be better off conserving their energy.
- almostarockstar 5y agoExcept that they only miss those shots because they haven't had enough practice attempting them.
- samatman 5y agoFor this to be true, lack of practice would have to be the only reason not to be a perfect tennis-playing machine. Which is of course absurd.
- almostarockstar 5y agoClearly there are more parameters than accumulated practice time, but I'm really getting at the point that some people (most people?) probably could manage to reach many of those tricky shots given enough practice. But they don't try every time and so sell themselves short in the long run. Rafa had to start somewhere, and he definitely did not hit every shot when he was a young boy. Tying this back to the OP - my criticism of the 'Umeshisms' described are that they're absurd when applied to a system where your strategy has fixed outcome probabilities. If you could improve your ability to get through airports quickly with practice, then it would be self evident that missing the odd flight is a consequence of improving your skill at the optimum rate. Or maybe I just don't understand the frame of reference of the OP.