I understand that this is meant as satire but it is not an example of "web3" as intended - blockchain and digital assets are just two (optional) component of a

I understand that this is meant as satire but it is not an example of "web3" as intended - blockchain and digital assets are just two (optional) component of a web3 stack; * can only be accessed through centralized DNS and Cloudflare (with no alternative way to get the front-end, e.g. ipfs, a git repo, or even a zip file with static assets that can be run locally) * content only hosted on centralized server (unsplash.com / googleusercontent.com). No sane person (even and especially the most ardent web3 proponents) would be proposing storing raw images on a blockchain for a use-case like this. There are far more suitable decentralized and/or distributed solutions for content distribution. This is a strawman if I ever saw one. https://web3.foundation/about/ https://web3.foundation/about/ (w3f skews heavily towards polkadot parachain solutions but look beyond the bias in their examples and it's quite representative) http://piped2bbch4xslbl2ckr6k62q56kon56ffowxaqzy42ai22a4sash3ad.onion/watch?v=l44z35vabvA&t=12s http://piped2bbch4xslbl2ckr6k62q56kon56ffowxaqzy42ai22a4sash...