3 ms·
In the UK I don't recall the public truly believing that Iraq actually had "weapons of mass destruction". The press had been calling the intelligence report the
by iamthemonster 5y ago
In the UK I don't recall the public truly believing that Iraq actually had "weapons of mass destruction". The press had been calling the intelligence report the "Dodgy Dossier" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Dossier https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Dossier and I recall wide doubt on the famous phrasing of weapons being "launched within 45 minutes" https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/feb/05/iraq.iraq1 https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/feb/05/iraq.iraq1 which it turns out referred to... conventional battle munitions like mortars.
It was an absolute shit show of lies that nobody really believed. A million people protested https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_anti-war_protests https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_anti-war_pr...
And still, the war went on as usual.
Even if 90% of Russians protested against the invasion of Ukraine I couldn't be sure it would make a difference.
As it is, most Russians don't even see this as a war, just a continuation of the ongoing Donbass conflict.
- tim333 5y agoMy recollection as an average UK member of the public was the news said 'allegations of WMDs' so I thought well maybe, then 'Hans Blix is investigating' so I thought fair enough and then 'UK and US forces have invaded without waiting for Blix'. So yeah not much you could do about it. It's probably similar for the Russian public.
- ptnxlo 5y ago90% of 140 millions of inhabitants is certainly a big number. Your example is quite extreme and might reflect that the country is completely out of context.