9 ms·

They did.

by andi999 5y ago

They did.

gruez 5y ago
AFAIK it was a random windows dev that said that, not some official company communication/promise.
- t-writescode 5y ago
  https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-10-the-last-version-of-windows https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-10-the-last-version-of-wi... > Microsoft's developer evangelist Jerry Nixon made the announcement at the company's Ignite conference in Chicago last week. That's a bit more than "a random dev".
  - gruez 5y ago
    I'm not sure about you, but "developer evangelist" sounds pretty rank and file to me. Searching his name he's apparently now a "Senior Software Engineer" on linkedin (can't click in, getting a login wall), which supports this.
    - t-writescode 5y ago
      This person, as an evangelist, spoke at an official event run by the company. That's why I think they're special.
      - gruez 5y ago
        You'd think that something as important as "we won't ever launch more editions of our most popular piece of software ever" would be disseminated more widely and across more channels than one "developer evangelist" interview in a conference? If that's real (ie. some sort of position that senior management actually approved), that is. I don't doubt he thought he was telling the truth, or that there was a general sense within the organization that windows 10 was going to get continually updated rather than having new editions every 3 years. Windows 10 did adopt this model for 6 years. But painting it as some sort of official promise from the organization seems tenuous.
        t-writescode 5y ago
        I think we're agreeing, but yelling past each other
        gruez 5y ago
        Right, I concede that "developer evangelist [...] at the company's Ignite conference" is slightly more reputable than just "random dev". That said I don't believe it materially changes the argument.
conradfr 5y ago
They also always say this is the Windows where upgrades won't require a reboot (since maybe XP?).
Nextgrid 5y ago
Until Apple moved on, then obviously they had to respond, because waging a version number war is better than actually making a decent, usable OS. Hint: people don't buy Macs because they're at version 11 (or 12 now), they buy it because the experience is much more polished than whatever Microsoft has been puking out in the last decade.

They did.

gruez 5y ago

AFAIK it was a random windows dev that said that, not some official company communication/promise.

t-writescode 5y ago
https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-10-the-last-version-of-windows https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-10-the-last-version-of-wi... > Microsoft's developer evangelist Jerry Nixon made the announcement at the company's Ignite conference in Chicago last week. That's a bit more than "a random dev".
- gruez 5y ago
  I'm not sure about you, but "developer evangelist" sounds pretty rank and file to me. Searching his name he's apparently now a "Senior Software Engineer" on linkedin (can't click in, getting a login wall), which supports this.
  - t-writescode 5y ago
    This person, as an evangelist, spoke at an official event run by the company. That's why I think they're special.
    - gruez 5y ago
      You'd think that something as important as "we won't ever launch more editions of our most popular piece of software ever" would be disseminated more widely and across more channels than one "developer evangelist" interview in a conference? If that's real (ie. some sort of position that senior management actually approved), that is. I don't doubt he thought he was telling the truth, or that there was a general sense within the organization that windows 10 was going to get continually updated rather than having new editions every 3 years. Windows 10 did adopt this model for 6 years. But painting it as some sort of official promise from the organization seems tenuous.
      - t-writescode 5y ago
        I think we're agreeing, but yelling past each other
        gruez 5y ago
        Right, I concede that "developer evangelist [...] at the company's Ignite conference" is slightly more reputable than just "random dev". That said I don't believe it materially changes the argument.

conradfr 5y ago

They also always say this is the Windows where upgrades won't require a reboot (since maybe XP?).

Nextgrid 5y ago

Until Apple moved on, then obviously they had to respond, because waging a version number war is better than actually making a decent, usable OS. Hint: people don't buy Macs because they're at version 11 (or 12 now), they buy it because the experience is much more polished than whatever Microsoft has been puking out in the last decade.