It's bad enough when hospitals get hacked. I can't imagine the problems that happen when the medical staff's 'biological enhancements' are hacked. In this comm

It's bad enough when hospitals get hacked. I can't imagine the problems that happen when the medical staff's 'biological enhancements' are hacked. In this community we sometimes talk about how some technical interviews are deeply unrealistic because they remove the candidate from, e.g. their IDE with tab autocompletion, or googling, which you might normally depend on. Your skills are best measured when you have access to the tools and environment which you'd actually use while working. And yet ... sometimes you can pair program with someone and it's clear that they don't really understand what they're accepting from the autocomplete, and this is legitimate cause for concern. I think I want doctors to definitely know a bunch of stuff unaided, even if they would normally always have access to supplementary references. If nothing else, they should have the habits of mind to be able to critically evaluate their references, and notice when they're wrong or suspect.