12 ms·

> responsible for signing off on practices they know too little about... Ok, well, there's the problem. Or at least most of it. No one should be even considere

> responsible for signing off on practices they know too little about... Ok, well, there's the problem. Or at least most of it. No one should be even considered to audit a system unless they understand how it works.

raesene9 5y ago
Aand there's a problem :) So if you consider the size of most audit teams relative to the size of the IT departments they audit, how do the auditors become subject matter experts in all the different types of technology in use in the organization? It's a tricky problem. One option is to audit against "known standards" but that's often a horrible hack as the standards themselves need maintained and with more cutting edge technologies (think the rise of cloud native) the standards may not even have been written yet (or are hard to maintain as the underlying tech evolves so quickly) Another option is to rely on external companies (e.g. the Big-4) but they don't have any more ways of getting large pools of SMEs in all the different technologies either (despite what their sales people might tell you).