3 ms·
Ok, that's an interesting take, as an example, I know that I'd toyed on several occasions paying for youtube red except that a part of me really fundamentally d
by Folcon 5y ago
Ok, that's an interesting take, as an example, I know that I'd toyed on several occasions paying for youtube red except that a part of me really fundamentally doesn't trust that they'll keep to their statement that it will actually be ad free[0].
As a comparison, I've paid for Spotify for a long time primarily to get rid of ads and was entirely ok with that.
I certainly pay for dev tools on a yearly basis that cost me a similar level as $257 a year and so I feel like paying for what Alphabet offer in terms of map / video / search fits comfortably in that same bracket of cost to value that I'd be ok making that trade as well.
I don't know if I'd pay themselves Alphabet that much, primarily because like with they Youtube example, what kind of a commitment[1] could they make that makes me believe that me paying them would mean they stop treating me as a product and as a customer instead? It sort of feels like that ship sailed a long time ago, ad money is very seductive it seems.
- [0]: It also doesn't help that their recommendation engine seems to give worse recommendations over time, so a regular purge seems to be required to get back to reasonable recommendations.
- [1]: This ends up being a fun thought experiment.
- pdonis 5y ago> what kind of a commitment[1] could they make that makes me believe that me paying them would mean they stop treating me as a product and as a customer instead? I'm not sure they could make a credible commitment to that at this point. I'm not sure there is any viable way for them to transition, at scale, from their current business model to one where they just charge users directly for services those users want. But the latter business model is still there, waiting, and sooner or later I think someone will find a way to use it to take Google's market.