3 ms·
Minimum possible disruption is almost certainly taking him out of the room?
by spywaregorilla 5y ago
Minimum possible disruption is almost certainly taking him out of the room?
- dharmab 5y agoEver seen someone removed from a room who didn't want to leave? It's not quiet.
- thawaya3113 5y agoI suspect the only people who can decide what would minimize disruption are the people who were actually there.
- inimino 5y agoThe frisking could have been done one-by-one in an adjacent room. But once you find the cheating, the best way is to let the test continue as normally as possible. Otherwise it creates a huge distraction for the other students as they wonder why that student had to leave.
- kenniskrag 5y agothe person is usually accused and maybe not guilty. Normaly you let them finish the exam and start the legal stuff afterwards (proof, counter arguments etc.)
- Zenbit_UX 5y agoIndeed. It can also serve as additional proof if on the new answer sheet given after confiscating the devices, the exam taker performs significantly worse than on the original answer sheet.
- ineedasername 5y agoDepends on how quietly he goes. Asking someone nicely who went to such lengths to cheat might turn bad fast, and then you're looking at the potential for physical altercations, calling security, etc. Or you just give them another sheet and worry about punishments later.
- sodality2 5y agoActually doing nothing and stopping them on the way out would be ideal, in my opinion. It gives them the chance to get cocky ("woohoo haven't get caught yet let me ramp this up a bit") and be more obvious about it, as well. (Unless it's the kind of cheating that disrupts others, of course, but hopefully it isn't?)