> So… a minimum viable product? For most companies a MVP is planting a fast growing seed of technical debt. It's rushed, not polished, full of bugs and used t

> So… a minimum viable product? For most companies a MVP is planting a fast growing seed of technical debt. It's rushed, not polished, full of bugs and used to see if you have any traction because your Product Owners and Sales teams usually have a significant disconnect and development is thought of as an after thought. If you can do a MVP in 1 month, but a minimal polished product in 2, I think that extra month will pay for itself if the product is worth anything. The worse thing a company can do is have your customers fund your products with a JIT development process. Sure some companies can get it right doing a true MVP, but most cant and it shows.