2 ms·
Thank you for you advice. "What I think is that most people would donate Bitcoin anyway so supporting many different cryptocurrencies wouldn't necessarily incr
by hutzlibu 5y ago
Thank you for you advice.
"What I think is that most people would donate Bitcoin anyway so supporting many different cryptocurrencies wouldn't necessarily increase the likelihood of a donation that much. With this assumption just setting up BTC is enough and this is very easy to do."
But my reasoning is, that I know quite some people have different niche crypto lying around, hoping they will be worth something at some point, so instead of giving nothing, they might give at least them. And maybe they will be worth something, so I would happily take them all.
And I am only casual following crypto, but it seems, that ethereum is a serious player as well.
"Also, consider that when you use Coinbase you don't have access to your private keys. It means that should Coinbase decide that you are no longer entitled to access for whatever reason, you'll be left with no power over the funds. "
And of this I am aware of, but since I am a EU resident, not aware of any crime or money laundering, I suppose there is no reason to blacklist me. They have a reputation to be aware of (and I suppose I could make some noise, if I would be screwed over) - and I am more scared to be honestly, to make a mistake with the wallet generation. But otherwise I probably would be fine with a bitcoin wallet and etherium. I consider it.
- ailef 5y agoI understand your reasoning. In this case, yes, Coinbase could be an easy way to set this up. You can set up your own wallets, but doing that for every crypto requires you to download multiple clients and manage multiple key pairs so it becomes messy. If you want to try it, you can download so called "light" wallets that do not require the complete sync with the blockchain, which can otherwise take hours/days. I'm aware the Dogecoin client has a version with this light sync, and probably other cryptos too. Good luck!