2 ms·
Isn't running multiple single-threaded workloads at the same time also a case for better performance with more cores? So even for basic tasks having more cores
by pantulis 5y ago
Isn't running multiple single-threaded workloads at the same time also a case for better performance with more cores? So even for basic tasks having more cores is better (although maybe not that cost-efficient)
- katbyte 5y agoonly if those workloads are very CPU intensive, and the ones that are should probably be parallelized as much as possible anyway.
- Forgeties79 5y agoSort of related: Adobe creative cloud is the most bloated, CPU-inefficient system I’ve ever had the displeasure of working with as a professional editor. I get FCPX is apple’s NLE but the render times smoke premier in comparison and CC in general is just way too busy in the background.
- zaptrem 5y agoRunning lots of cores at a low speed can be more efficient than one core at turbo speed.