5 ms·

Are they? Do you know about their contract with yandex? You are emotional about something that is 100% financial in nature. If it wouldn’t be you can bet that w

Are they? Do you know about their contract with yandex? You are emotional about something that is 100% financial in nature. If it wouldn’t be you can bet that with the Mozilla Foundation being the way they are in the last years would ponder themselves with a blog post or at least a tweet. Money talks or in this case it doesn’t anymore.

leosarev 5y ago
I'm ok with them cancelling contract with Yandex and changing defaults. I'm not ok with them removing this OPTION from browser.
- throwmeariver1 5y ago
  Do you really believe the options provided are provided without the services paying for it?
  - ogurechny 5y ago
    Back in the days of sane version numbers, localized bookmarks and other stuff relied on local community input. Promotions were solitary and visible, just from their URL parameters. It changed when browser started to be seen as only a muzzle that sucks the meat source into data processing pipeline.
Brian_K_White 5y ago
I doesn't matter why, what and how are damning enough on their own. A legit change in some deal does not explain several aspects of this update. When something doesn't add up, you are supposed to scrutinize it, not just assume it's fine. If it was fine, then why wasn't there an honest explanation? Mozilla did a bad thing. If our speculations about the why are wrong, it doesn't change anything about what is wrong with this update. But even the speculation is fair game in this case because the update lacks all the normal and expected justification and explaination of any other merge request. Feel free to explain the above-board reason they made quite this nature of update in quite this peculiar way. What other updates to your browser should be ok to just take blindly with no explanation? The immagination staggers.
- throwmeariver1 5y ago
  It’s their browser not yours if you don’t trust them use something else. I keep away from defaults especially search because they are usually paid for and not in good faith. They also dropped yandex two times already and you guessed it right… because of monetary reasons. This is not the smoking gun you want it to be.
  - ogurechny 5y ago
    “Their” browser is useless pile of code when it's not being run on someone's computer. My own computer, for example. Which is not their computer at all. You people seem to be totally brainwashed by corporate bullshit.
    - throwmeariver1 5y ago
      - ogurechny 5y ago
        That statement was not Firefox-specific. Marketing bullshit about saints above blessing lowly ignorant masses incapable of independent action with fad-of-the-year software (with a not so nice user agreement) should not be tolerated. We can all laugh at people who can't change a search engine, and call them dumb, but when something like Mozilla decides “these users are dumb, they get used to it”, it's a tad different story.
  - kelnos 5y ago
    > It’s their browser not yours if you don’t trust them use something else. That's... not how things work. If you're not happy about something, you should complain about it. That's the only way that people's preferences become known, and changes can be made. If we all constantly hopped from product to product when the product we're currently using does something we didn't like, we'd very quickly run out of options.
  - AniseAbyss 5y ago
kelnos 5y ago
> Do you know about their contract with yandex? I frankly don't care. I don't use Yandex, but if I did, I'd be really pissed off at this move. Firefox shouldn't be including only search engines that pay a fee; they should be including all search engines that their users might find useful.
- floatboth 5y ago
  The browser is provided for free. Selling search defaults/inclusions is by far the least intrusive way to make money to fund the development of the browser.
  - ipaddr 5y ago
    Least? Least would be fundraising in Hollywood not selling out default preferences to the highest bidder. Almost all browsers are free. All major and minor ones are free.
    - clucas 5y ago
      I suspect that if Firefox got most of its funding from Hollywood, it would be even more susceptible to the politics-du-jour. Why do you think high-profile fundraising would make Firefox more independent?
      - ipaddr 5y ago
        More user friendly browser without sponsored search engine defaults. More Mozilla fluff projects don't have to cross my life path.

leosarev 5y ago

I'm ok with them cancelling contract with Yandex and changing defaults. I'm not ok with them removing this OPTION from browser.

throwmeariver1 5y ago
Do you really believe the options provided are provided without the services paying for it?
- ogurechny 5y ago
  Back in the days of sane version numbers, localized bookmarks and other stuff relied on local community input. Promotions were solitary and visible, just from their URL parameters. It changed when browser started to be seen as only a muzzle that sucks the meat source into data processing pipeline.

Brian_K_White 5y ago

I doesn't matter why, what and how are damning enough on their own. A legit change in some deal does not explain several aspects of this update. When something doesn't add up, you are supposed to scrutinize it, not just assume it's fine. If it was fine, then why wasn't there an honest explanation? Mozilla did a bad thing. If our speculations about the why are wrong, it doesn't change anything about what is wrong with this update. But even the speculation is fair game in this case because the update lacks all the normal and expected justification and explaination of any other merge request. Feel free to explain the above-board reason they made quite this nature of update in quite this peculiar way. What other updates to your browser should be ok to just take blindly with no explanation? The immagination staggers.

throwmeariver1 5y ago
It’s their browser not yours if you don’t trust them use something else. I keep away from defaults especially search because they are usually paid for and not in good faith. They also dropped yandex two times already and you guessed it right… because of monetary reasons. This is not the smoking gun you want it to be.
- ogurechny 5y ago
  “Their” browser is useless pile of code when it's not being run on someone's computer. My own computer, for example. Which is not their computer at all. You people seem to be totally brainwashed by corporate bullshit.
  - throwmeariver1 5y ago
    - ogurechny 5y ago
      That statement was not Firefox-specific. Marketing bullshit about saints above blessing lowly ignorant masses incapable of independent action with fad-of-the-year software (with a not so nice user agreement) should not be tolerated. We can all laugh at people who can't change a search engine, and call them dumb, but when something like Mozilla decides “these users are dumb, they get used to it”, it's a tad different story.
- kelnos 5y ago
  > It’s their browser not yours if you don’t trust them use something else. That's... not how things work. If you're not happy about something, you should complain about it. That's the only way that people's preferences become known, and changes can be made. If we all constantly hopped from product to product when the product we're currently using does something we didn't like, we'd very quickly run out of options.
- AniseAbyss 5y ago

kelnos 5y ago

> Do you know about their contract with yandex? I frankly don't care. I don't use Yandex, but if I did, I'd be really pissed off at this move. Firefox shouldn't be including only search engines that pay a fee; they should be including all search engines that their users might find useful.

floatboth 5y ago
The browser is provided for free. Selling search defaults/inclusions is by far the least intrusive way to make money to fund the development of the browser.
- ipaddr 5y ago
  Least? Least would be fundraising in Hollywood not selling out default preferences to the highest bidder. Almost all browsers are free. All major and minor ones are free.
  - clucas 5y ago
    I suspect that if Firefox got most of its funding from Hollywood, it would be even more susceptible to the politics-du-jour. Why do you think high-profile fundraising would make Firefox more independent?
    - ipaddr 5y ago
      More user friendly browser without sponsored search engine defaults. More Mozilla fluff projects don't have to cross my life path.